Search

Search Results

Dryad Logo
McCune, J. L.; Rosner-Katz, Hanna; Bennett, Joseph; Schuster, Richard; Kharouba, Heather 2021-07-30 <p>Species distribution models (SDMs) are used to test ecological theory and to direct targeted surveys for species of conservation concern. Several studies have tested for an influence of species traits on the predictive accuracy of SDMs. However, most used the same set of environmental predictors for all species and/or did not use truly independent data to test SDM accuracy. We built eight SDMs for each of 24 plant species of conservation concern, varying the environmental predictors included in each SDM version. We then measured the accuracy of each SDM using independent presence and absence data to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and true positive rate (TPR). We used generalized linear mixed models to test for a relationship between species traits and SDM accuracy, while accounting for variation in SDM performance that might be introduced by different predictor sets. All traits affected one or both SDM accuracy measures. Species with lighter seeds, animal-dispersed seeds, and a higher density of occurrences had higher AUC and TPR than other species, all else being equal. Long-lived woody species had higher AUC than herbaceous species, but lower TPR. These results support the hypothesis that the strength of species-environment correlations is affected by characteristics of species or their geographic distributions. However, because each species has multiple traits, and because AUC and TPR can be affected differently, there is no straightforward way to determine a priori which species will yield useful SDMs based on their traits. Most species yielded at least one useful SDM. Therefore, it is worthwhile to build and test SDMs for the purpose of finding new populations of plant species of conservation concern, regardless of these species’ traits.</p>
Dryad Logo
Dryad
Gilbert, Benjamin; MacDougall, Andrew; Kadoya, Taku; Akasaka, Munemitsu; Bennett, Joseph; Lind, Eric; Flores-Moreno, Habacuc; Firn, Jennifer; Hautier, Yann; Borer, Elizabeth; Seabloom, Eric; Adler, Peter; Cleland, Elsa; Grace, James; Harpole, W.; Esch, Ellen; Moore, Joslin; Knops, Jean; McCulley, Rebecca; Mortensen, B.; Bakker, J.; Fay, Philip 2020-04-01 <p><b>Aim</b>: Climate variability threatens to destabilize production in many ecosystems. Asynchronous species dynamics may buffer against such variability when decreased performance by some species is offset by increased performance of others. However, high climatic variability can eliminate species through stochastic extinctions or cause similar stress responses among species, reducing buffering. Local conditions, such as soil nutrients, can further alter production stability directly or by influencing asynchrony. We test these hypotheses using a globally distributed sampling experiment.</p> <p><b>Location</b>: Grasslands in North America, Europe and Australia.</p> <p><b>Time period</b>: Annual surveys over five-year intervals occurring between 2007 and 2014.</p> <p><b>Major taxa studied</b>: Herbaceous plants.</p> <p><b>Methods</b>: We annually sampled per-species cover and aboveground community biomass (net primary productivity; NPP), plus soil chemical properties, in twenty-nine grasslands. We tested how soil conditions, combined with precipitation and temperature variability, affect species richness, asynchrony and temporal stability of primary productivity. We used bivariate relationships and structural equation modeling to examine proximate and ultimate relationships.</p> <p><b>Results</b>: Climate variability strongly predicted asynchrony, whereas NPP stability was more related to soil conditions. Species richness was structured by both climate variability and soils, and in turn increased asynchrony. Temperature and precipitation variability caused a unimodal asynchrony response, with asynchrony lowest at low and high climate variability. Climate impacted stability indirectly through its effect on asynchrony, with stability increasing at higher asynchrony due to lower inter-annual NPP variability. Soil conditions had no detectable effect on asynchrony but increased stability by increasing mean NPP, especially when soil organic matter was high.</p> <p><b>Main Conclusions</b>: We found globally consistent evidence that climate modulates species asynchrony, but that the direct effect on stability is low relative to local soil conditions. Nonetheless, our observed unimodal responses to temperature and precipitation variability suggest asynchrony thresholds, beyond which there are detectable destabilizing impacts of climate on primary productivity.</p>

Map search instructions

1.Turn on the map filter by clicking the “Limit by map area” toggle.
2.Move the map to display your area of interest. Holding the shift key and clicking to draw a box allows for zooming in on a specific area. Search results change as the map moves.
3.Access a record by clicking on an item in the search results or by clicking on a location pin and the linked record title.
Note: Clusters are intended to provide a visual preview of data location. Because there is a maximum of 50 records displayed on the map, they may not be a completely accurate reflection of the total number of search results.