Search

Search Results

University of Alberta Dataverse Logo
Borealis
Brown, Charlotte; Cahill Jr., James, F. 2020-05-26 This is the replication data associated with our article in our "Journal of Vegetation Science" titled "Standing vegetation as a coarse biotic filter for seedbank dynamics: effects of gap creation on seed inputs and outputs in a native grassland". Please see the ReadMe file for details on dataset contents. (2019-06-07)
University of Alberta Dataverse Logo
Borealis
Brown, Charlotte; Oppon, Kenneth; Cahill Jr., James F. 2019-04-01 This is the replication data associated with our article in our "Functional Ecology" titled "Species-specific size vulnerabilities in a competitive arena: Nutrient heterogeneity and soil fertility alter plant competitive size-asymmetries". Please see the ReadMe file for details on dataset contents.
Dryad Logo
Dryad
Chagnon, Pierre-Luc; Brown, Charlotte; Stotz, Gisela C.; Cahill, James F. 2020-04-16 When placing roots in the soil, plants integrate information about soil nutrients, plant neighbours and beneficial/detrimental soil organisms. While the fine-scale spatial heterogeneity in soil nutrients and plant neighbours have been described previously, virtually nothing is known about the spatial structure in soil biotic quality (measured here as a soil Biota-Induced plant Growth Response, or BIGR), or its correlation with nutrients or neighbours. Such correlations could imply trade-offs in root placement decisions. Theory would predict that soil BIGR is (1) negatively related to soil fertility and (2) associated with plant community structure, such that plants influence soil biota (and vice versa) through plant-soil feedbacks. We would also expect that since plants have species-specific impacts on soil organisms, spatially homogeneous plant communities should also homogenize soil BIGR. Here, we test these hypotheses in a semiarid grassland by (1) characterizing the spatial structure of soil BIGR at a scale experienced by an individual plant and (2) correlating it to soil abiotic properties and plant community structure. We do so in two types of plant communities: (1) low-diversity patches dominated by an invasive grass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) and (2) patches covered mostly by native vegetation, with the expectation that dominance by Bromus would homogenize soil BIGR. Soil BIGR was spatially heterogeneous, but not autocorrelated. This was true in both vegetation types (Bromus-invaded vs. native patches). Conversely, soil abiotic properties and plant community structure were frequently spatially autocorrelated at similar scales. Also, contrary to many studies, we found a positive correlation between soil BIGR and soil fertility. Soil BIGR was also associated with plant community structure. Synthesis. The positive correlation between soil BIGR and some soil nutrient levels suggests that plants don't necessarily trade-off between foraging for nutrients vs. biotic interactions: nutritional cues could rather indicate the presence of beneficial soil biota. Moreover, the spatial structure in plant communities, coupled with their correlation with soil BIGR, jointly suggest that plant-soil feedbacks operate at local scales in the field: this has been identified in modelling studies as an important driver of plant coexistence.
University of Alberta Dataverse Logo
Borealis
Brown, Charlotte; Cahill Jr., J. F. 2019-07-22 This is the replication data associated with our article in our "Journal of Vegetation Science" titled "Vertical size structure is associated with productivity and species diversity in a short-stature grassland: Evidence for the importance of height variability within herbaceous communities". Please see the ReadMe file for details on dataset contents. (2019-06-07)

Map search instructions

1.Turn on the map filter by clicking the “Limit by map area” toggle.
2.Move the map to display your area of interest. Holding the shift key and clicking to draw a box allows for zooming in on a specific area. Search results change as the map moves.
3.Access a record by clicking on an item in the search results or by clicking on a location pin and the linked record title.
Note: Clusters are intended to provide a visual preview of data location. Because there is a maximum of 50 records displayed on the map, they may not be a completely accurate reflection of the total number of search results.