Search

Search Results

Dryad Logo
Clare, Elizabeth L.; Fazekas, Aron J.; Ivanova, Natalia V.; Floyd, Robin M.; Hebert, Paul D.N.; Adams, Amanda M.; Nagel, Juliet; Girton, Rebecca; Newmaster, Steven G.; Fenton, M. Brock; Hebert, Paul D. N. 2018-10-31 As molecular tools for assessing trophic interactions become common, research is increasingly focused on the construction of interaction networks. Here we demonstrate three key methods for incorporating DNA data into network ecology and discuss analytical considerations using a model consisting of plants, insects, bats and their parasites from the Costa Rican dry forest. The simplest method involves the use of Sanger sequencing to acquire long sequences to validate or refine field identifications, for example of bats and their parasites, where one specimen yields one sequence and one identification. This method can be fully quantified and resolved and these data resemble traditional ecological networks. For more complex taxonomic identifications, we target multiple DNA loci e.g. from a seed or fruit pulp sample in faeces. These networks are also well resolved but gene targets vary in resolution and quantification is difficult. Finally for mixed templates such as faecal contents of insectivorous bats we use DNA metabarcoding targeting two sequence lengths (157bp, 407bp) of one gene region and a MOTU, BLAST and BIN association approach to resolve nodes. This network type is complex to generate and analyse and we discuss the implications of this type of resolution on network analysis. Using these data we construct the first molecular-based network of networks containing 3304 interactions between 762 nodes of 8 trophic functions and involving parasitic, mutualistic, and predatory interactions. We provide a comparison of the relative strengths and weaknesses of these data types in network ecology. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
Dryad Logo
Dryad
Garrett, Nina; Watkins, Jonathan; Simmons, Nancy; Fenton, M. Brock; Maeda-Obregon, Alejandro; Sanchez, Daniel; Froehlich, Emma; Walker, Faith; Littlefair, Joanne E.; Clare, Elizabeth 2022-12-29 <p><span lang="EN-US">Environmental (e)DNA has rapidly become a powerful biomonitoring tool, particularly in aquatic ecosystems. This approach has not been as widely adopted in terrestrial communities where the methods of vertebrate eDNA collection have varied from the use of secondary collectors such as blood-feeding parasites and spider webs to washing surfaces of leaves and soil sampling. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential of direct collection of eDNA from air sampling, but none have tested how effective airborne eDNA sampling might be in a </span><span lang="EN-CA">biodiverse environment.</span> <span lang="EN-US">We used three prototype samplers to actively sample a mixed neotropical bat community in a partially controlled environment. We assess whether airborne eDNA can accurately characterize a high-diversity community with skewed abundances and to determine if filter design impacts DNA collection and taxonomic recovery. Our study provides evidence for the accuracy of airborne eDNA as a detection tool and highlights its potential for monitoring high-density, diverse assemblages such as </span><span lang="EN-CA">bat roosts. </span><span lang="EN-US">Analysis of air samples recovered &gt;91% of the species present and some limited relationship between species abundance and read count. Our data suggest this method can accurately depict a diverse mixed mammal community, particularly when the location is contained (e.g., a roost, den or burrow) but also highlights the potential for secondary transfer of eDNA material on clothing and equipment. Our results also demonstrate that simple, inexpensive, battery-operated homemade air samplers can collect an abundance of eDNA from the air, opening the opportunity for sampling in remote environments. </span></p> https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Map search instructions

1.Turn on the map filter by clicking the “Limit by map area” toggle.
2.Move the map to display your area of interest. Holding the shift key and clicking to draw a box allows for zooming in on a specific area. Search results change as the map moves.
3.Access a record by clicking on an item in the search results or by clicking on a location pin and the linked record title.
Note: Clusters are intended to provide a visual preview of data location. Because there is a maximum of 50 records displayed on the map, they may not be a completely accurate reflection of the total number of search results.