Search

Search Results

City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-04-18 This was one single topic on Traffic Safety Culture. To view the survey questions, click on the following link: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=1095&as=ly5Bo19WX4&t=1 Open from July 25, 2016 to August 3, 2016. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 6494 Insight Community Members. 1824 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 28%. A total of 1824 respondents completed the survey: 1824 Insight Community Members and 0 using the anonymous link(s) which will have no demographic info. Column definitions can be found as an attachment to this dataset (under the About option, in the Attachment section).
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2019-07-19 Records of pools (bodies of water) sampled by city staff for presence of mosquito larvae.
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2016-09-16 This was one single topic among many as part of the February 2016 Mixed Topic survey. To view the survey questions, click on the following link: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=832&as=oC92qQ8rl2&t=1 Open from February 08 - 16, 2016. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 4537 Insight Community Members. 1746 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 38%. A total of 1752 respondents completed the survey: 1746 Insight Community Members and 6 using the anonymous link which will have no demographic info.
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2015-08-26 This was one single topic among many as part of the August 2015 Mixed Topic survey. Test link to view these questions: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=476&as=Hp0xa33UD7&t=1. Open from August 10 - 18, 2015. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 3275 Insight Community Members. 1329 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 41%. A total of 1442 respondents completed the survey: 1329 Insight Community Members and 113 using the anonymous link which will have no demographic info.
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2016-11-07 This was one single topic among many as part of the May 2016 Mixed Topic survey. To view the survey questions, click on the following link: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=1034&as=2vI4vr1V7R&t=1 Open from May 10 - 17, 2016. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 6410 Insight Community Members. 1963 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 31%. A total of 1965 respondents completed the survey: 1963 Insight Community Members and 2 using the anonymous link(s) which will have no demographic info. Column definitions can be found as an attached document, found under the "About" option, in the "Attachments" section.
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-03-28 This was one single topic among many from Part 1 of the March 2017 Mixed Topic survey. To view the survey questions, click on the following link: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=1583&as=y9uZ0LU45H&t=1 Open from March 14 - 21, 2017. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 6696 Insight Community Members. 1850 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 28%. A total of 1869 respondents completed the survey: 1850 Insight Community Members and 19 using the anonymous link(s) which will have no demographic info. Column definitions can be found as an attachment to this dataset (under the About option, in the Attachment section).
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-10-18 An explanation surrounding injection drug use and access to medically supervised injection services was given to Respondents. A planned delivery model was provided as a small-scale health service with agencies that work with this population and a variety of wraparound supports. Respondents were asked to<br />select one response only to the following: Do you agree with this approach?
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-05-23 This raster file was created as a result of a 2016 study, using 2014 data, done for the Edmonton area to determine the vulnerable drainage and sewage areas of Edmonton in regards to a 1 in 100 year rainfall event. Due to the constant changing of subsurface infrastructure (adding, upgrading, etc.) combined with the constant changing definition of a 1 in 100 year rainfall event (based on historic rainfall amounts), this raster file reflects the results of a study done in 2016 and should neither suggest previous year’s vulnerabilities nor future year’s vulnerabilities. For a more regional Edmonton area breakdown of the Study’s results: https://www.edmonton.ca/city_government/documents/RoadsTraffic/City-wide_Flood_Mitigation_Study.pdf There are three different colour to the vulnerability of the roadways and the corresponding ponding depth that would occur for that area during a large rainstorm. Those colours are: Green (representing the depth from surface that sanitary flows can surcharge from less than 2.5 m) Yellow (representing the depth from surface that sanitary flows can surcharge from 1.5 to 2.5 m) Red (representing the depth from surface that sanitary flows can surcharge from greater than 1.5 m) This Raster file is best viewed overlaid with the 2016 Flood Mitigation Study - Drainage and Sanitation Surcharge Map; as the various coloured areas follow the subsurface infrastructure (and the corresponding roadways if you are also viewing the street map as a layer). Disclaimer: No Warranty with Flood Risk Maps. Your use of the flood risk maps is solely at your own risk, and you are fully responsible for any consequences arising from your use of the flood risk maps. The flood risk maps are provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis, and you agree to use them solely at your own risk. There are no warranties, expressed or implied in respect to the flood risk maps or your use of them, including without limitation, implied warranties and conditions of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. Please note that the flood risk maps have been modified from their original source, and that all data visualization on maps are approximate and include only records that can be mapped. This dataset is based on 2014 information and will not be updated further. The model is based on a theoretical, worst-case scenario storm that has never occurred in the Edmonton area. Model Accuracy: The LiDar used was a 5 meter grid system. LiDar has an accuracy of ? cm horizontally/vertically. Bare Earth LiDar was used in for this model surface. This is a spline fit interpolations model. This is a 1D-1D model with 2D interpolations.The accuracy of the information provided in these data sets is plus or minus 10 cm vertically, and 10 cm horizontally. The 100 year flood was based on the 2015 Edmonton 4 year Chicago storm event over 20 plus neighbourhoods. The data is a collection of the worst case scenario of model runs. This is a common practice for Edmonton drainage models. These models are high level concept and projects determined from this data set will undergo finer, more detailed modeling. These maps are a visual representation and intended to be used when prioritization of the best engineering solutions that are scheduled to be brought forward to Utility Council to mitigate future flooding in the City. The best engineering solutions are high level concept designs and require further modeling and design. At the time of the PDF release, November 9, 2016 there was no funding for any projects to be completed or for further design. Strategy will be brought forward to Utility Committee on June 7, 2017. Council will be determining funding and rate of project completion. The Storm size used in these models are larger than Edmonton has historically seen. Historically, as seen in 2004 and 2012, only 4 neighbourhoods at a time were hit with the 100 year rainstorm event. With the continuation of the City-Wide Flood Mitigation Strategy these maps will become obsolete with smaller storms being applied to the area. Disclaimer: No Warranty with Flood Risk Maps. Your use of the flood risk maps is solely at your own risk, and you are fully responsible for any consequences arising from your use of the flood risk maps. The flood risk maps are provided on an “as is” and “as available” basis, and you agree to use them solely at your own risk. There are no warranties, expressed or implied in respect to the flood risk maps or your use of them, including without limitation, implied warranties and conditions of merchantability and fitness for any particular purpose. Please note that the flood risk maps have been modified from their original source, and that all data visualization on maps are approximate and include only records that can be mapped. File Type: GeoTIFF Geo Coordinate System: WGS84
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-12-14 Respondents were asked to select one response only to the following: Of the factors you chose previously, which one was the most important when choosing the home you live in now? Note: Free form text responses are not published
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2017-03-29 This was one single topic among many from Part 2 of the March 2017 Mixed Topic survey. To view the survey questions, click on the following link: https://www.edmontoninsightcommunity.ca/R.aspx?a=1623&as=9jF1MQ27Rm&t=1 Open from March 21 - 28, 2017. At the time the survey was launched survey invitations were sent to 6705 Insight Community Members. 1748 members completed the survey which represents a completion rate of 26%. A total of 1758 respondents completed the survey: 1748 Insight Community Members and 10 using the anonymous link(s) which will have no demographic info. Column definitions can be found as an attachment to this dataset (under the About option, in the Attachment section).
City of Edmonton Open Data Portal Logo
2018-11-16 Driver Feedback Sign DFS156 Latitude: 53.44625 Longitude: -113.57585 The City has a number of Driver Feedback Signs (DFS) installed around the city. These units collect data as traffic approaches them and in some cases may display a message or a speed that is being detected. Also, these units are radar based and can only track one vehicle at a time (strongest signal). Due to the number of DFS installations combined with the volume of data collected, each DFS has its own dataset. Details of how the data is collected by the DFS are as follows: - Data is accumulated and reported in 15 minute intervals - Vehicle speeds are captured/reported in speed intervals (bins) - Speed range/interval for the bins are determined by parameters/settings set for the DFS (Minimum/Maximum Speed Detection Setting) - Two speed values are recorded for every vehicle - a Highest Speed Detected and a Slowest Speed Detected (explaining why there are two vehicle counts) - The bins go from Bin 1 to Bin 10. Bin 1 can also be referred to a LO BIN and Bin 10 can also be referred to as HIGH BIN. Things to note: DFS devices are not to be used as or confused with traffic counters, as they are not. DFS devices have a minimum detectable speed of approximately 6 km/hr. DFS devices have a maximum (theoretical) detectable speed of approximately 225 km/hr. DFS devices are programmable with different parameters that can also follow a timed schedule.
Ottawa Ouverte Logo
2019-07-31 Le nombre d’ETP prévus au budget et associés à des postes, par portefeuille, par service et par direction. Ces chiffres diffèrent de ceux du nombre d’employés. Le nombre d’ETP est utilisé à des fins budgétaires pour quantifier les postes approuvés par le Conseil et financés à même les budgets de fonctionnement alimentés par les taxes et les tarifs. Ce nombre englobe les postes à temps plein, à temps partiel, à salaire et à taux horaire, ainsi que les emplois occasionnels et étudiants. <br /><br /> <strong>Exactitude</strong>: Les données du rapport d’analyse des ETP ne contiennent aucune erreur connue. Elles ont été prélevées à un moment précis et, bien qu’elles soient un indicateur utile des tendances et des postes, elles deviendront périmées à mesure que progresse l’année, en raison du nombre de changements continuellement apportés à l’administration municipale et aux postes. Pour la même raison, il pourrait être difficile de faire des comparaisons d’une année à l’autre. <br /><br /> <strong>Fréquence des mises à jour</strong>: <br /><br /> <strong>Courriel de l'auteur</strong>: <a href='mailto:Robert.Vincent@ottawa.ca'>Robert Vincent</a>
Dryad Logo
2021-05-07 <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Context:</b> Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance (CFTR) dysfunction may play a role in CF-related bone disease (CFBD). Ivacaftor is a CFTR potentiator effective in improving pulmonary and nutritional outcomes in patients with the G551D-CFTR mutation. The effects of ivacaftor on bone health are unknown.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Objective:</b> To determine the impact of ivacaftor on bone density and microarchitecture in children and adults with CF.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Design:</b> Prospective observational multiple cohort study.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Setting:</b> Outpatient clinical research center within a tertiary academic medical center.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Patients or Other Participants</b>: Three cohorts of age-, race-, and gender-matched subjects were enrolled: 26 subjects (15 adults and 11 children) with CF and the G551D-CFTR mutation who were planning to start or had started treatment with ivacaftor within three months (Ivacaftor cohort); 26 subjects with CF were not treated with ivacaftor (CF Control cohort); and 26 healthy volunteers.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Interventions:</b> All treatments, including ivacaftor, were managed by the subjects’ pulmonologists.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Main Outcome Measures:</b> Bone microarchitecture by high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT), areal bone mineral density (aBMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and bone turnover markers at baseline, 1, and 2 years.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Results: </b> Cortical volume, area, and porosity at the radius and tibia increased significantly in adults in the Ivacaftor cohort. No significant differences were observed in changes in aBMD, trabecular microarchitecture, or estimated bone strength in adults or in any outcome measures in children.</p> <p style="margin-bottom:11px;"><b>Conclusions: </b>Treatment with ivacaftor was associated with increases in cortical microarchitecture in adults with CF. Further studies are needed to understand the implications of these findings.</p> https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

Map search instructions

1.Turn on the map filter by clicking the “Limit by map area” toggle.
2.Move the map to display your area of interest. Holding the shift key and clicking to draw a box allows for zooming in on a specific area. Search results change as the map moves.
3.Access a record by clicking on an item in the search results or by clicking on a location pin and the linked record title.
Note: Clusters are intended to provide a visual preview of data location. Because there is a maximum of 50 records displayed on the map, they may not be a completely accurate reflection of the total number of search results.