Recherche

Résultats de recherche

Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Meyer, Pierre-Francois; Tremblay-Mercier, Jennifer; Leoutsakos, Jeannie; Madjar, Cecile; Lafaille-Magnan, Marie-Elyse; Savard, Melissa; Rosa-Neto, Pedro; Poirier, Judes; Etienne, Pierre; Breitner, John 2019-05-03 Objective: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose naproxen for prevention of progression in pre-symptomatic AD among cognitively intact persons at-risk. Methods: INTREPAD, a two-year double-masked pharmaco-prevention trial, enrolled 195 AD family history-positive elderly (mean age 63 years) screened carefully to exclude cognitive disorder. These were randomized 1:1 to naproxen sodium 220mg twice-daily or placebo. Multimodal imaging, neurosensory, cognitive and (in ~50%) CSF biomarker evaluations were performed at Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. A modified intent-to-treat analysis considered 160 participants who remained on-treatment through their first follow-up examination. The primary outcome was rate of change in a multimodal composite pre-symptomatic Alzheimer Progression Score (APS). Results: Safety: Naproxen-treated individuals showed a clear excess of adverse events. Efficacy: Among treatment groups combined, the APS increased by 0.101 points/year (S.E = 0.014; P < 10-5), but rate of change showed little difference by treatment assignment (0.017 points/year). The treatment-related slope ratio of 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 0.588–2.04) suggested that naproxen does not reduce the rate of APS progression by more than 41%. Secondary analyses revealed no notable treatment effects on individual CSF, cognitive, or neurosensory biomarker indicators of progressive pre-symptomatic AD. Conclusions: In cognitively intact individuals at-risk, sustained treatment with naproxen sodium 220 mg twice-daily increases frequency of adverse health effects but does not reduce apparent progression of pre-symptomatic AD. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that, for people who are cognitively intact, low-dose naproxen does not significantly reduce progression of a composite indicator of pre-symptomatic AD.
Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Therriault, Joseph; Pascoal, Tharick; Benedet, Andrea; Fernandez-Arias, Jaime; Wang, Tina; Berzgin, Gleb; Kang, Min Su; Lussier, Firoza; Chamoun, Mira; Savard, Melissa; Tissot, Cecile; Massarweh, Gassan; Soucy, Jean-Paul; Vitali, Paolo; Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita; Gauthier, Serge; Rosa-Neto, Pedro 2021-12-17 <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Objective:</b> <span style="background:white;"> To assess the frequency of biologically-defined Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in relation to age, sex and <i>APOEε4</i>, as well as rates of discordance between clinically- and biologically defined AD. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Methods:</b> <span style="background:white;">We assessed cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly (n=166), amnestic MCI (n=77) and probable AD dementia (n=62) subjects who underwent evaluation by dementia specialists and neuropsychologists in addition to amyloi</span>d-PET with [<sup>18</sup>F]AZD4694<span style="background:white;"> and tau-PET with [<sup>18</sup>F]MK6240. Individuals were grouped according to their AD biomarker profile. Positive predictive value for biologically-defined AD was assessed in relation to clinical diagnosis. Frequency of AD biomarker profiles were assessed using logistic regressions with odds ratios and 95% CIs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Results:</b> <span style="background:white;">The clinical diagnosis of probable AD dementia demonstrated good agreement with biologically-defined AD (positive predictive value: 85.2%). 7.88% of CU elderly subjects were positive for both amyloid-PET and tau-PET. Frequency of biologically-defined AD increased with age (OR: 1.14; p&lt;0.0001) and frequency of <i>APOEε4</i> allele carriers (Single <i>ε4: </i>OR: 3.82; <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001; Double <i>ε4: </i>OR: 17.55, <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Discussion:</b> While we observed <span style="background:white;">strong, but not complete, agreement between clinically-defined “probable AD” dementia and biomarker positivity for both amyloid</span>-β<span style="background:white;"> and tau, we also observed that biologically-defined AD was not rare in CU elderly. A</span>bnormal tau-PET was almost exclusively observed in individuals with abnormal amyloid-PET. <span style="background:white;">Our results highlight that even in tertiary care memory clinics, detailed evaluation by dementia specialists systematically underestimates the frequency of biologically-defined AD and related entities. </span></p>

Instructions pour la recherche cartographique

1.Activez le filtre cartographique en cliquant sur le bouton « Limiter à la zone sur la carte ».
2.Déplacez la carte pour afficher la zone qui vous intéresse. Maintenez la touche Maj enfoncée et cliquez pour encadrer une zone spécifique à agrandir sur la carte. Les résultats de la recherche changeront à mesure que vous déplacerez la carte.
3.Pour voir les détails d’un emplacement, vous pouvez cliquer soit sur un élément dans les résultats de recherche, soit sur l’épingle d’un emplacement sur la carte et sur le lien associé au titre.
Remarque : Les groupes servent à donner un aperçu visuel de l’emplacement des données. Puisqu’un maximum de 50 emplacements peut s’afficher sur la carte, il est possible que vous n’obteniez pas un portrait exact du nombre total de résultats de recherche.