Recherche

Résultats de recherche

Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Suarez-Gonzalez, Adriana; Hefer, Charles A.; Lexer, Christian; Cronk, Quentin C.B.; Douglas, Carl J.; Cronk, Quentin C. B. 2018-02-26 Introgression can introduce novel genetic variation at a faster rate than mutation alone, and result in adaptive introgression when adaptive alleles are maintained in the recipient genome over time by natural selection. A previous study from our group demonstrated adaptive introgression from Populus balsamifera into P. trichocarpa in a target genomic region. Here we expanded our local ancestry analysis to the whole genome of both parents to provide a comprehensive, unbiased view of introgression patterns and to identify additional candidate regions for adaptive introgression genome-wide. Populus trichocarpa is a large, fast-growing tree of mild coastal regions of the Pacific northwest, whereas P. balsamifera is a smaller stature tree of continental and boreal regions with intense winter-cold. The species are parapatric with extensive hybridization. Here, using local ancestry analysis, we detected asymmetric patterns of introgression across the whole genome of these two species of poplar trees adapted to contrasting environments, with stronger introgression from P. balsamifera to P. trichocarpa than vice versa. Admixed P. trichocarpa individuals showed more genomic regions with unusually high levels of introgression (19 regions) compared with admixed P. balsamifera (9 regions) but also the largest introgressed peak (1.02 Mb). Our analysis also revealed numerous candidate regions for adaptive introgression with strong signals of selection, notably related to disease resistance, and enriched for genes that may play crucial roles for survival and adaptation. Furthermore, we revealed overrepresentation of subtelomeric regions in P. balsamifera introgression into P. trichocarpa and possible protection of the sex-determining regions from interspecific gene flow.
Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Percy, Diana M.; Page, Roderic D. M.; Cronk, Quentin C. B.; Cronk, Quentin C.B.; Page, Roderic D.M. 2018-07-18 An increasing number of plant-insect studies using phylogenetic analysis suggest that cospeciation events are rare in plant–insect systems. Instead, nonrandom patterns of phylogenetic congruence are produced by phylogenetically conserved host switching (to related plants) or tracking of particular resources or traits (e.g., chemical). The dominance of host switching in many phytophagous insect groups may make the detection of genuine cospeciation events difficult. One important test of putative cospeciation events is to verify whether reciprocal speciation is temporally plausible. We explored techniques for double-dating of both plant and insect phylogenies. We use dated molecular phylogenies of a psyllid (Hemiptera)–Genisteae (Fabaceae) system, a predominantly monophagous insect–plant association widespread on the Atlantic Macaronesian islands. Phylogenetic reconciliation analysis suggests high levels of parallel cladogenesis between legumes and psyllids. However, dating using molecular clocks calibrated on known geological ages of the Macaronesian islands revealed that the legume and psyllid radiations were not contemporaneous but sequential. Whereas the main plant radiation occurred some 8 million years ago, the insect radiation occurred about 3 million years ago. We estimated that >60% of the psyllid speciation has resulted from host switching between related hosts. The only evidence for true cospeciation is in the much more recent and localized radiation of genistoid legumes in the Canary Islands, where the psyllid and legume radiations have been partially contemporaneous. The identification of specific cospeciation events over this time period, however, is hindered by the phylogenetic uncertainty in both legume and psyllid phylogenies due to the apparent rapidity of the species radiations.

Instructions pour la recherche cartographique

1.Activez le filtre cartographique en cliquant sur le bouton « Limiter à la zone sur la carte ».
2.Déplacez la carte pour afficher la zone qui vous intéresse. Maintenez la touche Maj enfoncée et cliquez pour encadrer une zone spécifique à agrandir sur la carte. Les résultats de la recherche changeront à mesure que vous déplacerez la carte.
3.Pour voir les détails d’un emplacement, vous pouvez cliquer soit sur un élément dans les résultats de recherche, soit sur l’épingle d’un emplacement sur la carte et sur le lien associé au titre.
Remarque : Les groupes servent à donner un aperçu visuel de l’emplacement des données. Puisqu’un maximum de 50 emplacements peut s’afficher sur la carte, il est possible que vous n’obteniez pas un portrait exact du nombre total de résultats de recherche.