
Garcia-Machado, Erik;
Normandeau, Eric;
Bernatchez, Louis;
Côté, Guillaume
—
2023-06-15
<p><span lang="en-CA">For nearly 15 years now, environmental DNA</span><span lang="en-CA"> has demonstrated</span><span lang="en-CA"> its effectiveness in monitoring biodiversity. Methodological and technical improvements have significantly enhanced the field. However, the effect of factors such as sequence coverage, bioinformatic filtration and primer choice have been less explored or need to be optimized according </span><span lang="en-CA">to </span><span lang="en-CA">specific survey objectives and </span><span lang="en-CA">study </span><span lang="en-CA">site characteristics. We evaluated these factors </span><span lang="en-CA">to </span><span lang="en-CA">help optimize monitoring fish biodiversity in North American temperate lakes. We sampled water for fish community eDNA analysis in 12 lakes from southwestern Québec, Canada. The lakes were selected to encompass a wide range of surface areas and species richness. We sampled water from a total of </span><span lang="en-US">520</span><span lang="en-CA"> sites (25 to 50 per lake) and analyzed three mitochondrial DNA regions (12S rRNA; 16S rRNA; and cytb) using NovaSeq</span><span lang="en-US"> sequencing. Our results, based on rarefied count matrices (from a sequencing depth of 100,000 to a minimum </span><span lang="en-US">depth </span><span lang="en-US">of 1,000 reads per sample), </span><span lang="en-US">showed</span><span lang="en-US"> that </span><span lang="en-US">keeping only</span><span lang="en-US"> species </span><span lang="en-US">in each sample if they</span><span lang="en-US"> represented </span><span lang="en-US">at least one thousandth (species </span><span lang="en-US">minimum </span><span lang="en-US">read proportion threshold =</span><span lang="en-US"> 0.001</span><span lang="en-US">)</span><span lang="en-US"> of the </span><span lang="en-US">sample's</span><span lang="en-US"> reads was adequate to remove false positives </span><span lang="en-US">and had a limited negative</span><span lang="en-US"> impact on true positives</span><span lang="en-US"> with low read counts. The</span><span lang="en-US"> sequencing depth </span><span lang="en-US">was found to have</span><span lang="en-US"> a negligible impact </span><span lang="en-US">on the accuracy</span><span lang="en-US"> of fish </span><span lang="en-US">community assessment in a given lake. With the same sequencing depth and a complete local reference database for each primer set, </span><span lang="en-US">a single primer set </span><span lang="en-US">produced</span><span lang="en-US"> similar species richness medians than the combination of two or three primer sets. Overall, 12S and 16S detected more species and provided more consistent community profiles than cytb. </span><span lang="en-CA">Based on our observations, we suggest using the 12S MiFish-U primer set and applying a minimum proportion of 0.001 reads per species and site to monitor north-temperate lentic freshwater fish communities.</span></p>