Recherche

Résultats de recherche

Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Meyer, Pierre-Francois; Tremblay-Mercier, Jennifer; Leoutsakos, Jeannie; Madjar, Cecile; Lafaille-Magnan, Marie-Elyse; Savard, Melissa; Rosa-Neto, Pedro; Poirier, Judes; Etienne, Pierre; Breitner, John 2019-05-03 Objective: Evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose naproxen for prevention of progression in pre-symptomatic AD among cognitively intact persons at-risk. Methods: INTREPAD, a two-year double-masked pharmaco-prevention trial, enrolled 195 AD family history-positive elderly (mean age 63 years) screened carefully to exclude cognitive disorder. These were randomized 1:1 to naproxen sodium 220mg twice-daily or placebo. Multimodal imaging, neurosensory, cognitive and (in ~50%) CSF biomarker evaluations were performed at Baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. A modified intent-to-treat analysis considered 160 participants who remained on-treatment through their first follow-up examination. The primary outcome was rate of change in a multimodal composite pre-symptomatic Alzheimer Progression Score (APS). Results: Safety: Naproxen-treated individuals showed a clear excess of adverse events. Efficacy: Among treatment groups combined, the APS increased by 0.101 points/year (S.E = 0.014; P < 10-5), but rate of change showed little difference by treatment assignment (0.017 points/year). The treatment-related slope ratio of 1.10 (95% Confidence Interval 0.588–2.04) suggested that naproxen does not reduce the rate of APS progression by more than 41%. Secondary analyses revealed no notable treatment effects on individual CSF, cognitive, or neurosensory biomarker indicators of progressive pre-symptomatic AD. Conclusions: In cognitively intact individuals at-risk, sustained treatment with naproxen sodium 220 mg twice-daily increases frequency of adverse health effects but does not reduce apparent progression of pre-symptomatic AD. Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that, for people who are cognitively intact, low-dose naproxen does not significantly reduce progression of a composite indicator of pre-symptomatic AD.
Dryad Translation missing: fr.blacklight.search.logo
Dryad
Therriault, Joseph; Pascoal, Tharick; Benedet, Andrea; Fernandez-Arias, Jaime; Wang, Tina; Berzgin, Gleb; Kang, Min Su; Lussier, Firoza; Chamoun, Mira; Savard, Melissa; Tissot, Cecile; Massarweh, Gassan; Soucy, Jean-Paul; Vitali, Paolo; Saha-Chaudhuri, Paramita; Gauthier, Serge; Rosa-Neto, Pedro 2021-12-17 <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Objective:</b> <span style="background:white;"> To assess the frequency of biologically-defined Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in relation to age, sex and <i>APOEε4</i>, as well as rates of discordance between clinically- and biologically defined AD. </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Methods:</b> <span style="background:white;">We assessed cognitively unimpaired (CU) elderly (n=166), amnestic MCI (n=77) and probable AD dementia (n=62) subjects who underwent evaluation by dementia specialists and neuropsychologists in addition to amyloi</span>d-PET with [<sup>18</sup>F]AZD4694<span style="background:white;"> and tau-PET with [<sup>18</sup>F]MK6240. Individuals were grouped according to their AD biomarker profile. Positive predictive value for biologically-defined AD was assessed in relation to clinical diagnosis. Frequency of AD biomarker profiles were assessed using logistic regressions with odds ratios and 95% CIs.</span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Results:</b> <span style="background:white;">The clinical diagnosis of probable AD dementia demonstrated good agreement with biologically-defined AD (positive predictive value: 85.2%). 7.88% of CU elderly subjects were positive for both amyloid-PET and tau-PET. Frequency of biologically-defined AD increased with age (OR: 1.14; p&lt;0.0001) and frequency of <i>APOEε4</i> allele carriers (Single <i>ε4: </i>OR: 3.82; <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001; Double <i>ε4: </i>OR: 17.55, <i>p</i>&lt;0.0001). </span></p> <p style="text-align:justify;"><b>Discussion:</b> While we observed <span style="background:white;">strong, but not complete, agreement between clinically-defined “probable AD” dementia and biomarker positivity for both amyloid</span>-β<span style="background:white;"> and tau, we also observed that biologically-defined AD was not rare in CU elderly. A</span>bnormal tau-PET was almost exclusively observed in individuals with abnormal amyloid-PET. <span style="background:white;">Our results highlight that even in tertiary care memory clinics, detailed evaluation by dementia specialists systematically underestimates the frequency of biologically-defined AD and related entities. </span></p>